FI/CO recovery
Chart of accounts, parallel ledgers, document splitting, profit centres, allocations and the CO–FI bridge — reset from the numbers outward so the close and management reporting are trustworthy again.
SAP — JPS-iQ is the S/4 HANA recovery Business Unit of the JPS-iQ Solutions Group. We step in where a program has gone off-track, where the finance close no longer holds, where consolidation won't run reliably, or where a partner has lost trust — senior architecture and finance ownership instead of another delivery layer.
S/4 HANA at the core. Next to it: finance & controlling depth and group consolidation incl. RAR — as a connected ownership line, not as separate workstreams.
We don't compete on volume. We compete on calibre. Three credentials that decide which partner a CFO trusts with an S/4 program that has already failed to deliver once.
We don't treat SAP recovery as a long backlog but as three connected terrains. Each has its own failure modes and reset paths — but only one shared target model carries an audit-proof close and a stable S/4 system.
Chart of accounts, parallel ledgers, document splitting, profit centres, allocations and the CO–FI bridge — reset from the numbers outward so the close and management reporting are trustworthy again.
Group Reporting, intercompany, currency translation and statutory consolidation — plus Revenue Accounting and Reporting where contract logic and revenue recognition need to be restored.
S/4 HANA rollouts that slip, run unstable, or have lost partner trust — brought back to a realistic re-baseline, with senior architecture ownership through to a stable live operation.
Read: why an S/4 programme's real diagnosis starts with the numbers →Recovery is qualitative, not calculable. The value shows up where CFO, auditors and board trust the numbers again — and where the board gets a program back on track that was drifting into a governance liability.
S/4 programme off-track or finance close unreliable? 30 minutes with a senior S/4 architect.
Book a diagnostic callRecovery is not a patch. The target is an S/4 system that carries finance, controlling, consolidation and RAR as one model — not a pile of workarounds, shadow spreadsheets and partner-handed-over construction sites. The target picture stands before the first stabilisation sprint begins.
Four reasons CFOs, finance leaders and IT steering committees call us when an S/4 program has already failed to deliver once — and not the next generic delivery team.
We rescue, we don't sell. Recovery is not a side product between rollout projects — it is our actual business. That means clean re-baseline thinking, a defined intervention window and a hard exit path — rather than new modules to grow revenue.
Chart of accounts, CO structure, consolidation and RAR are treated as one model from day one — not as four separate workstreams trying to agree at go-live. Every decision runs through the period-end close lens.
No junior consulting on recovery terrain. The person in the diagnostic call remains accountable through to stable live operations — to the CFO, not to a delivery pool.
We advise against S/4 if it won't carry. As part of the JPS-iQ Solutions Group we have NetSuite, Dynamics 365 and other systems in-house — and we say openly when a reset into another ERP is the more honest path.
We don't take over the full backlog. We take over the finance-critical parts that decide whether the program can close a book, consolidate a group and answer the CFO's questions on the first attempt.
Every engagement is framed as a defined intervention — clear scope, clear outcomes, clear exit — not as open-ended augmentation.
Chart of accounts, parallel ledgers, document splitting, AR/AP, tax, asset accounting — design that survives statutory and group close.
Profit centres, cost centres, allocations, product costing, margin analysis and the CO–FI bridge — fixed so management reporting is credible again.
SAP RAR / IFRS 15 & ASC 606: contract acquisition, performance obligations, allocation, revenue recognition and integration into FI/CO and group close.
Group Reporting or BPC — hierarchies, intercompany elimination, currency translation, statutory output and audit trail.
S/4 migrations, release upgrades, ISV or partner switches — framed finance-first rather than backlog-first.
Material Ledger, Actual Costing, production orders, intercompany stock transfers and the end-to-end bridge from logistics postings into FI and margin analysis.
Period-end close discipline, reconciliation between FI, CO and Group, audit trail and control evidence in SAP.
Senior finance leadership inside the S/4 program — scope discipline, decision logs and CFO-aligned reporting.
Where does your SAP programme or system stand today? A structured second opinion. No sales pressure.
Book a second opinionRecovery work fails when it drifts without an endpoint. Each of the four steps has a defined trigger, a defined output and a defined exit, so the intervention closes on a stabilised programme — not a slow fade back into the same drift.
Targeted review of FI, CO, Group and RAR design, test results, close evidence and decision history. Clear view on what is actually broken — and what is only loud.
Finance-first reset of scope, priorities and timeline, defined recovery milestones and a rebuilt agreement between CFO, program and vendors.
Hands-on leadership of the FI, CO, Group and RAR workstreams until close, consolidation and reporting run to the defined standard.
Decision log, documented design, trained internal owners and a defined exit point — no permanent dependency on the recovery team.
Not every S/4 program goes off-track for the same reason. Four environments where finance depth and consolidation complexity decide success or failure — and where recovery delivers the strongest leverage.
Material Ledger, Actual Costing, make-to-stock vs. make-to-order margin analysis and intercompany stock transfers — where supply-chain postings carry or break FI/CO.
Multi-entity, multi-country consolidation with intercompany complexity, currency translation, parallel ledgers and a statutory output that survives audit.
Case study: a 14-entity group cut its close from 22 to 8 days →Energy, utilities and other regulated environments — regulated revenue models, IS-U / S/4 Utilities, unbundling and regulatory reporting with finance design that survives both statutory close and regulatory audit.
Subscription, contract and project-driven revenue, BRIM / convergent invoicing integration and RAR-heavy revenue recognition — and the bridge into FI, CO and Group Reporting.
SAP — JPS-iQ is personally led by Managing Director Joerg H. Paul Schaefer. He runs the diagnostic call, stays accountable through re-baseline and stabilisation, and remains the senior line into the CFO until the engagement exits.
Managing Director · Business Unit Lead SAP
JP Consulting — JPS-iQ Solutions Group
"We don't sell S/4 — we stabilise it. Recovery starts at the chart of accounts, not the backlog, because a programme is only fixed once the close closes clean again."
No marketing gloss. The questions CFOs, finance heads and IT steering committees actually ask before committing to an SAP recovery — and straight answers on how we work.
SAP — JPS-iQ is the SAP recovery Business Unit of the JPS-iQ Solutions Group. We step in where an S/4 HANA program has gone off-track, where the finance close no longer holds, where a group consolidation won't run reliably, or where a delivery partner needs to be replaced.
FI & CO recovery, group & consolidation incl. RAR, and program rescue for S/4 rollouts are the three focus areas.
Because we run recovery as a core offering, not as a side line. That means senior architecture and finance ownership instead of junior consulting, a clean re-baseline approach instead of more modules, and one accountable line from the diagnostic call through to a stable live operation.
First: we do not sell S/4 — we stabilise it. Our offer kicks in when rollouts slip, systems run unstable or partners underdeliver.
Second: finance discipline from day one. Chart of accounts, CO structure, consolidation and RAR are treated as one model, not as separate workstreams.
Third: we are part of an ERP-agnostic group. If another system (NetSuite, Dynamics 365) fits better, we say so.
Worth it: enterprise groups with an S/4 program that has gone off-track; finance teams with an unreliable close or a consolidation that doesn't survive audit; organisations wanting to exit an underperforming partner relationship; programs with ISV or upgrade breakage.
Less worth it: new S/4 implementations in standard scope without finance depth — there are larger SAP system houses for that.
A 30-minute diagnostic call: where does the program or system stand? Red flags, finance stability, partner reality, time window. No vendor pitch.
For recovery cases, a 1–2 week assessment typically follows, with a re-baseline sketch and realistic stabilisation options on one page.
Chart of accounts clean-up, CO structure redefinition, costing rebuild, profit centre hierarchies, margin analysis, AR/AP logic, intercompany reconciliation, period-end close automation, consolidation interfaces.
Plus RAR (Revenue Accounting & Reporting) where contract logic and revenue recognition need to be restored. Goal: finance numbers that controlling, audit and the board trust again.
Recovery comes before module thinking. Start with a structured diagnostic call — with an honest read on what is fixable, what needs a reset and where senior intervention will actually move. No vendor pitch in the first call.